The Effect of Multiple Choice and Essay Assessments Based on Everyday Contexts on English Learning Outcomes of Students in Grade VII of Junior High School

Authors

  • Amalia Zulfan Hadi UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin, Serang, Banten
  • Nasiha Amirotul Khoiriyah UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin, Serang, Banten
  • Mika Avialisha Tama UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin, Serang, Banten
  • Selnistia Hidayani UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin, Serang, Banten

Keywords:

Contextual Assessment, Young Learners, English Learning

Abstract

This study investigates the implementation and outcomes of context-based multiple-choice and essay assessments in English learning among seventh-grade junior high school students as young learners. Using a descriptive quantitative method, 16 students at SMP Islam Nur Al Qalam were tested using questions related to daily life topics (e.g., self-introduction, daily routines). Results showed that 75% scored in the “Good” to “Excellent” range on the multiple-choice test, and 50% did so on the essay section. These findings suggest that contextual assessments enhance students’ understanding and expression, supporting the Contextual Teaching and Learning theory. The study concludes that this assessment approach is effective and appropriate for evaluating English outcomes in young learners. Therefore, contextual assessments are considered effective and age-appropriate tools for evaluating English learning outcomes among young learners in junior high school.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=EMQlAQAAIAAJ

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Ascd.

Brown, J. D. (2016). Assessment in ELT: Theoretical options and sound pedagogical choices. English Language Teaching Today: Linking Theory and Practice, 67–82.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press.

Johnson, E. B. (2007). Contextual Teaching&Learning. Mizan Learning Center.

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B., & Masia, B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. (New York: McKay, 1964.).

Nikolov, M., & Timpe-Laughlin, V. (2021). Assessing young learners’ foreign language abilities. In Language Teaching (Vol. 54, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000294

Silvia Marni, Roekhan, T. H. (2019). Critical Thinking Patterns of First-Year Students in Argumentative Essay Received : 14 August 2019 Abstract Accepted : 30 August 2019 Keywords : To cite this article : 7(September), 683–697.

Suhartono, E., Ediyanto, E., & Atmoko, A. (2025). The Implementation of Authentic Assessment in Contextual Approach in Civics Education at a Junior High School in Malang Regency. 3576, 2080–2096.

Țîru, C. M., & Maria, C. (2024). The Implications of Assessment Based on Contextual Learning on Students ’ Results. https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2024.27.08

Downloads

Published

2025-06-16

Issue

Section

Articles