PENDEKATAN SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUE DALAM PEMBAHASAN MOTOR LISTRIK UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMP
Keywords:
socioscientific issue, argumentasi, motor listrikAbstract
Penelitian ini yang bertujuan mendeskripsikan suatu peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik SMP dalam pembahasan motor listrik setelah dilakukan pendekatan socioscientific issue dalam pembelajaran IPA. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian dengan quantitatif pre-experimental dan one group pretest posttest design. Subjek dalam penelitian ini yaitu 25 siswa kelas VIIB SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Taman Sidoarjo tahun 2023/2024. Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu dengan menggunakkan observasi, tes, dan angket. Kemampuan argumentasi siswa diukur menggunakkan pretest dan posttest lalu dianalisis menggunakkan uji Wilcoxon dan effect size. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu terdapat peningkatan yang signifikan kemampuan argumentasi siswa SMP setelah pembelajaran. Peningkatan juga dapat terlihat dari level argumentasi siswa dimana pada pretest sebagian besar siswa berada pada level 1 yaitu sebanyak 73,08% siswa sedangkan pada posttest 100% siswa mencapai level 3 hingga 5. Effect size sebesar 1,576 dengan kategori besar sehingga pendekatan socioscientific issue dalam pembelajaran IPA memiliki pengaruh yang besar terhadap peningkatan argumentasi siswa.
Downloads
References
Anwar, N. P., & Ali, M. A. (2020). The effect of socio-scientific issue (SSI) based discussion: A student-centred approach to the teaching of argumentation. SOTL in the South, 4(2), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v4i2.76
Atabey, N., & Topcu, M. S. (2017). The Effects of socioscientific issues based instruction on middle school students ’ argumentation quality. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(36), 61–71.
Attaqi, V. (2020). Analisis Argumentasi dalam Socioscientific Issues (SSI). Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Aufschnaiter, C. Von, Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.20213
Badeo, J. M., & Duque, D. A. (2022). Journal of Technology and Science Education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 4(4), 215–227. Diambil dari http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/110/142
Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958
Borgerding, L. A., & Dagistan, M. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ concerns and approaches for teaching socioscientific and controversial issues. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1440860
Cohen. (1998). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Devi, N. D. C., Susanti VH, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ability in the topic of Buffer Solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v3i3.23308
Dewi, A. I. K., Suyono, S., & Erman, E. (2023). Effectiveness of Socioscientific Issues (SSI) Based Learning to Improve Argumentation Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2866
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Erman, Susiyawati, E., Martini, & Subekti, H. (2021). IDEA: Model Scaffolding Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Socio-scientific Issues. (N. Wakhidah, A. Ahmadi, & U. Azizah, Ed.).
Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Lederman, N. G. (2021). Developing an instrument to assess pedagogical content knowledge for biological socioscientific issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103217
Nurlatifah, S., Tukiran, T., & Erman, E. (2018). The Development of Learning Material Using Learning Cycle 7E with Socio-scientific Issues Context in Rate of Reaction to Improve Studentrs Argumentation Skills in Senior High School, 157(Miseic), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.20
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS “Survival Manual.” Sydney: Open University Press.
Purwati, R., Suranto, Sajidan, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Problem-Based Learning Modules with Socio-Scientific Issues Topics to Closing the Gap in Argumentation Skills. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(4), 35–45.
Rahayu, Y., Suhendar, S., & Ratnasari, J. (2020). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Gerak SMA Negeri Kabupaten Sukabumi-Indonesia. Biodik, 6(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i3.9802
Rahman, D. F. (2018). Analisis Argumentasi dalam Isu Sosiosaintifik Siswa SMP. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 1(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i1.3868
Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction : a multi-level assessment study, 0693(July). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204481
Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Wati, A. F. E., Sari, M. S., & Suhadi, S. (2023). Improving Undergraduate Students’ Argumentation Skills Through Problem-Based E-Module with Socio-Scientific Issues Topics. Bioedukasi, 21(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v21i2.39596
Yacoubian, H. A., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986
Zairina, S., & Hidayati, S. N. (2022). Analisis Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMP Berbantuan Socio-Scientific Issue Pemanasan Global. Jurnal Pensa : Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 37–43. Diambil dari https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific Issues as a Curriculum Emphasis: Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge.
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research, 1–9.
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173684
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elinda Budinarianti, Enny Susiyawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
